[95091] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Trains
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Wed Nov 28 12:39:50 2012
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:42:32 +1000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNmt0pS9R4Co_pRfFHA2iFMdYS526FmUcRm7jHgQNVZdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
--===============3076424431661865643==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_06ece239-9bdb-4810-ba85-43932aaa2e4d_"
--_06ece239-9bdb-4810-ba85-43932aaa2e4d_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ghItlhpu' De'vID=2C jatlh:
> We didn't have (m)any examples of relative clauses with adverbials before=
did we?
None that I can think of=2C but I'm not yet fully familiar with all the tex=
t of the paq'batlh.
> Now we have a clearer understanding of the following kinds of sentences.
(poD)
In truth I would have had no trouble at all interpreting most of those sent=
ences. The only ones that make me hesitate a little are those that begin wi=
th two adverbials=3B it's not immediately apparent whether the second belon=
gs to the {-bogh} clause or to the main clause (since we don't know much ab=
out whether there are limits on adverbials in a single sentence).
> {lengbogh DujlIj'e' nom qIp loQ jejHa'bogh 'etlhDaj}
I would also accept {nom lengbogh DujlIj'e' qIp loQ jejHa'bogh 'etlhDaj}=2C=
although the meaning of that is more ambiguous (again=2C the question aris=
es as to whether {nom} parses into the main clause or the subordinate).
QeS =
--_06ece239-9bdb-4810-ba85-43932aaa2e4d_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>
ghItlhpu' De'vID=2C jatlh:<br>>=3B We didn't have (m)any examples of rela=
tive clauses with adverbials before did we?<br><br>None that I can think of=
=2C but I'm not yet fully familiar with all the text of the paq'batlh.<br><=
br><div>
<p dir=3D"ltr">>=3B Now we have a clearer understanding of the following =
kinds of sentences.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br></p><p dir=3D"ltr">(poD)</p><p dir=3D"ltr"><br></p><p di=
r=3D"ltr">In truth I would have had no trouble at all interpreting most of =
those sentences. The only ones that make me hesitate a little are those tha=
t begin with two adverbials=3B it's not immediately apparent whether the se=
cond belongs to the {-bogh} clause or to the main clause (since we don't kn=
ow much about whether there are limits on adverbials in a single sentence).=
<br></p><p dir=3D"ltr"><br></p>>=3B {lengbogh DujlIj'e' nom qIp loQ jejHa=
'bogh 'etlhDaj}<br><br>I would also accept {nom lengbogh DujlIj'e' qIp loQ =
jejHa'bogh 'etlhDaj}=2C although the meaning of that is more ambiguous (aga=
in=2C the question arises as to whether {nom} parses into the main clause o=
r the subordinate).<br><br>QeS</div> </div></body>
</html>=
--_06ece239-9bdb-4810-ba85-43932aaa2e4d_--
--===============3076424431661865643==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============3076424431661865643==--
