[94718] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: luj

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Tue Sep 25 09:54:51 2012

From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:54:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: <0fb4b01f2ddb0b2b7096c8cc5cdce5cd@localhost.localdomain>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

> Klingon Word of the Day for Saturday, September 22, 2012
> 
> Klingon word:   luj
> Part of speech: verb
> Definition:    lose,not win)

As used in canon:

lujpu' jIH 
I have failed. TKD

lujpu' jIH'e' 
I, and only I, have failed. TKD

bIlujlaHbe'chugh bIQaplaHbe' 
If you cannot fail, you cannot succeed. TKW
("If you cannot lose, you cannot win"; i.e. Nothing ventured, nothing gained).

wo' choqmeH may' DoHlu'chugh lujbe'lu' 
"ending a battle to save an empire is no defeat." TKW

Cultural notes:

KGT 165-66:  The slang expression is used in such constructions as {bIvonlu'pu'} ("You have failed completely"; literally, "You have been trapped"). In standard Klingon, the same idea may be expressed by saying {lujbej} ("certainly fail"), {lujchu'} ("fail perfectly"), or {lujqu'} ("really fail"), all based on {luj} ("fail"). Note that {luj} is also used to mean lose (as in "lose at a game"). To say "I lose" is {jIluj}; to say "I lose in a big way" is {jIlujqu'} or {jIlujchu'}

HQ 2.4:18:  To a Klingon, to win is to function perfectly. The opposite notion, lose, is commonly {luj}, also meaning 'fail'.


Don't confuse with the verb {chIl} "lose, misplace".

Related words:

Qap 		win (a competition, or a war) (v)
Quj  	play a game (v)
SuD 		gamble, take a chance (v)
qaD 		challenge (v)
'ov 		compete (v)
pe''egh 	keep score (v)


--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post