[94706] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: Qu'vatlh

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Thu Sep 20 10:09:01 2012

From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:08:40 +0000
In-Reply-To: <F52986192E9FE346B0B7EF3D6F98E87711C62A22@EXDB3.ug.kth.se>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

Voragh:
>> AFAIK never used in canon.  Does it - or any other curse
>> for that matter - appear in the {paq'batlh}?

Felix:
> petaQ is used a fair bit, as one might expect.

Thanks for checking this.
 =

> It contains this footnote (which I believe was written by Sch=F6nefeld,
> not Okrand):
>
> P'takh (petaQ) is a Klingon insult, meaning something like "weirdo,"
> deriving from the verb "to be weird" (taQ), with and you (plural)
> imperative prefix (pe-). Alternative romanizations include pahtak,
> p'tak, patahk, and pahtk.

Sustel reported that footnote (p. 70f.?) back in June, to which ghunchu'wI'=
 replied:

  ... don't put much stock in the authority of the footnotes.
  (ghunchu'wI', 6/25/2012)

The supposed etymology is fairly obvious and, in fact, Kevin A. Geiselman p=
osted the same analysis sometime in the 1990's:

  To call someone a {petaQ} would be calling him some sort of
  weirdo or pervert.

I included Kevin's comment in my "Voragh's Notes on Klingon Cursing", which=
 can still be found on the net.  Sch=F6nefeld may have seen a copy of this =
document.

> Interestingly, the text contains the line <nItlhejbogh petaQmey tInuD>
> ("Look att hese p'takhs at your side"), shouted by Molor at Kahless;
> not sure if the <-mey> was intentional to add insult to, well, insult.
> [It also contains the phrase <nuqDaq ghaH petaQ'e'> ("Where is the
> p'takh [...]"), with <ghaH> rather than <'oH>.]
> =

> Molor also tell Kahless <petaQ'a' SoH>, which is translated as "You
> dirty p'takh,". So, apparently <petaQ'a'> is a thing.

It's not surprising that the pronouns is {ghaH} as the epithet refers to a =
person.  I'd imagine the same is true for the epithet {Ha'DIbaH}:  ?{nuqDaq=
 ghaH romuluS Ha'DIbaHvetlh'e'}.  If you wanted to add even more insult to =
insult, you could say {nuqDaq 'oH petaQ'e'} using the pronoun used with act=
ual animals.  =



--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post