[94606] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] -Ha' on adverbs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Wed Sep 5 12:24:31 2012
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmP+p-y2UYqj1U58fXhzTq76oiDfQDYi_kR0-AVma3C3zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:23:55 -0400
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh
<qeslagh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I would have thought wejHa' to mean "no longer, not any more", and while
> discussing it at the aforementioned breakfast ghunchu'wI' noted another
> potential meaning (I don't remember it, unfortunately) that was also
> logical.
Way back when we first had clues that {-Ha'} could be affixed to
adverbials, I proposed {wejHa'} as meaning "still". Someone
immediately answered saying he agreed completely, except that he would
understand it as "already". We quickly decided that it was not a
productive discussion.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:20 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
> If {DaHHa'} doesn't work, how else would you say "not now"?
I've always said {wej} for that meaning.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
