[94597] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] -Ha' on adverbs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Klingonteacher)
Wed Sep 5 08:55:58 2012
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:55:17 +0200
From: Klingonteacher <levinius@gmx.de>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W536186DB6A8CBDAC1B6363AAA90@phx.gbl>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
ghItlh QeS 'utlh:
> As Qov said, Marc basically implied that -Ha' is *grammatically* legal
> on any adverb, but for some it's semantically nonsensical. It was
I just wrote an email starting with "sorry for not answering sooner" and
I wrote {tughHa' jIjangmo' jItlhIj}.
I think that would be understandable, right? Even in english "un-soon"
is quite close to "late".
Lieven.
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
