[93784] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' cha'vatlh wej: toy'wI''a' QaQ
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Mon Jun 18 16:33:30 2012
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120618125824.0569da48@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:32:50 -0400
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
>> > ghum HaSta. jatlh Qa'bar, "Duj vISaqnISqa'.
>> > Sajolta'DI' nom vISaqta'. povbe' Daqvam." 'et ghoS.
>>
>> It took me much longer to understand this than it should have. I
>> wasn't expecting {Duj vISaqnISqa'} in the context of a ship that was
>> currently on the ground.
>
> I don't like {SaqHa'} for take off. Would you prefer {Duj vIpuvnISmoH 'ej
> SanISqa'}? =A0It seems kind of wordy. =A0What do you say if your car can'=
t stay
> on the street past three pm and you have to put it somewhere else? =A0I'm
> looking for a "I have to repark the car," kind of thing.
I'd probably go for a simple "move it" or "change its location".
{Daqmaj vIchoHnIS} -- or should it be {vIchoHnISmoH}?
> I guess you were
> stuck on the "resume landing" meaning rather than the "land again."
No, I was stuck on the discrepancy between already having landed and
needing to land again. I failed to appreciate quickly the implied need
to take off first as part of the process of "relanding".
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
