[93612] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Time and Type 7 verb suffixes

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Qov)
Sat Jun 9 11:51:51 2012

Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:51:26 -0600
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CABDLMbWxQWXr63qYHb9px+51JvCdpR4jwznnW6zrx1GH9CYKZQ@mail.g
 mail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

At 07:43 '?????' 6/9/2012, Andr=C3=A9 M=C3=BCller wrote:
>David,
>
>Similarly, the Perfective aspect in Russian =

>works differently from the Perfective aspect =

>marker (=E4=BA=86) in Chinese, although both encompass =

>the global definition of "perfective aspect". =

>It's now quite common to make this distinction =

>between capitalized and non-capitalized terms, =

>but not everyone does that. And it might not =

>have been as wide-spread decades ago when the TKD was written.

I was studying Russian in university while TKD =

was being written and never encountered the =

capitalized form in my many battles with =

perfective and imperfective verbs. In Russian, =

mastery of when to use each is often cited as =

something that an adult learner of the language =

will never achieve, so subtle and complex is the =

distinction, so I really don't have a problem =

with it being a bone of contention in Klingon.

- Qov =



_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post