[93539] in tlhIngan-Hol

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 125,000

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID jonpIn)
Wed Jun 6 03:56:55 2012

In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120605224243.082f7160@flyingstart.ca>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:56:39 +0200
From: "De'vID jonpIn" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

--===============4477543539763578523==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303bfe1e73d9f804c1c91b10

--20cf303bfe1e73d9f804c1c91b10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Qov:
>>> qepHomwIjDaq jatlh ghojwI', "chay' <125,000> jIjatlh?"

*{wa' chorghvI' 'uy'}

No, not really, but I wish *{-vI'} generalised in this way (from
{vatlhvI'}).

qurgh:
>> wa'bIp cha'netlh vaghSaD

Qov:
> That makes sense. Is that canonical, qurgh?

Why else would we have {bIp} and {netlh}?

--
De'vID

--20cf303bfe1e73d9f804c1c91b10
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<p>Qov:<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; qepHomwIjDaq jatlh ghojwI&#39;, &quot;chay&#39; &lt;125,000&gt; jIjatlh?&quot;</p>
<p>*{wa&#39; chorghvI&#39; &#39;uy&#39;}</p>
<p>No, not really, but I wish *{-vI&#39;} generalised in this way (from {vatlhvI&#39;}).</p>
<p>qurgh:<br>
&gt;&gt; wa&#39;bIp cha&#39;netlh vaghSaD</p>
<p>Qov:<br>
&gt; That makes sense. Is that canonical, qurgh?</p>
<p>Why else would we have {bIp} and {netlh}?</p>
<p>--<br>
De&#39;vID</p>

--20cf303bfe1e73d9f804c1c91b10--


--===============4477543539763578523==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============4477543539763578523==--

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post