[93306] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix Malmenbeck)
Mon May 21 03:19:01 2012
From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: De'vID jonpIn <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>, KLI <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:38 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmPVPC3VBUOBUMscfGtriiVi3asu_2XdKw1L2up0B+CcXw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
> Yes, it works for {-mo'}. I think that's what I ended up saying.
> However, it doesn't work for other suffixes, like {-DI'}.
{ngugh} should work for {-DI'}. -pa', -taH-vIS and -meH are trickier, though. I'd probably go with using something like {qaS[pa'/taHvIS/meH]}. May br cases where that wouldn't work, though.
________________________________________
From: De'vID jonpIn [de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 08:21
To: KLI
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'
De'vID:
>> Because when I'm speaking, I sometimes finish saying something before I realise I wanted to
>> make it the first part of a longer sentence, and I don't want to start over.
loghaD:
> What about {vaj}?
Yes, it works for {-mo'}. I think that's what I ended up saying. However, it doesn't work for other suffixes, like {-DI'}.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
