[93030] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nu'uchtaH San ghop
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Qov)
Fri Apr 27 11:07:33 2012
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:03:01 -0700
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
From: Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmP=Kg3zO7TSDvS5Birsknyk_uzKqdGVUKo8OZsjGtHh0A@mail.g
mail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
I liked choH. Or maybe choHmoH. SIgh is too weak.
At 05:52 '?????' 4/27/2012, you wrote:
> >> Qapbej 'e' Sovchu', 'ach Qap 'e' luHon neghDaj.
>
> > Ah, just realised {negh} is grammatically singular. I think.
>
>{'e' Hon neghDaj} looks odd but I guess it's grammatically correct.
>
> >> rInDI' may', {Nobunaga}vaD jatlh boQDaj: <San ghop choHlaH pagh.>
>
>Also {choH} might not work for {ghop} here... maybe {SIgh}?
>_______________________________________________
>Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
>http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
