[92680] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] po' (was: wa'maH cha' jatlhwI'pu' po'qu' chaH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID jonpIn)
Tue Mar 27 10:00:54 2012
In-Reply-To: <CA+cwSm8DXbynqfnmrwXdy9TxqvP+EcS-zH=RQoRsYSXM5_VVcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:00:38 +0200
From: "De'vID jonpIn" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
De'vID:
>> So there's a TKD floating around out there somewhere with a
>> canonicalised error.
Philip Newton:
> Hm, is it really canonicalised?
>
> Perhaps it could be compared with the pronunciations of actors on
> takes that didn't make it into the final film: they exist but they
> don't (IMO) form canon; they are irrelevant.
>
> And an admitted error should not - again IMO - form canon, either.
A poor choice of wording on my part. MO has made errors in canon,
which we all recognise as errors (like {Hagh} instead of {HaD} in
TKD). By "canonicalised" I don't mean that it's good Klingon, only
that it's part of the "Okrandian canon", which certainly includes
errors.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
