[92678] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] po' (was: wa'maH cha' jatlhwI'pu' po'qu' chaH

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Philip Newton)
Tue Mar 27 09:52:27 2012

In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmMt8xXjuRmmrvCtmvPCCpVVTjK7meRwKMdLJP8YSCxSyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:51:48 +0200
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:05, De'vID jonpIn <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
> So there's a TKD floating around out there somewhere with a
> canonicalised error.

Hm, is it really canonicalised?

Perhaps it could be compared with the pronunciations of actors on
takes that didn't make it into the final film: they exist but they
don't (IMO) form canon; they are irrelevant.

And an admitted error should not - again IMO - form canon, either.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post