[92405] in tlhIngan-Hol
[Tlhingan-hol] Spelling reform (was: Re: KLI CanonHom (was:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Qov)
Fri Mar 2 16:07:49 2012
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:05:35 -0800
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
From: Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <84F60A82-A51C-405C-BB9C-3FC4C1EA23E9@evertype.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
At 12:38 02/03/2012, Michael Everson wrote:
>who believes that the syllable "lIl" should mean 'difficult to
>discern; illegible' in
But it's not. It could only possibly be lay 'It lay. And it's not
half as bad as my hand-scrawled "they are transmitting you guys
useful data." (I make long straight qaghwI'mey).
I learned pIqaD about a month before I found out it was now
semi-canon in Monopoly, and would looooove if we could e-mail in
it. Does anyone else's pIqaD handwriting make people snicker too
much if they label the table?
I have to admit to being on the side of "stupid traditional
orthographies make a language endearing." I don't even want a
spelling reform for my own reprehensibly spelled language.
- Qov
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
