[92286] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qo''e' tu'bogh pagh - 'ay' wa'maH wej
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robyn Stewart)
Fri Feb 24 18:55:14 2012
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:53:54 -0800
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmOU=LV0-SDM_xec71WNsVDu+U8=pro=Jv7Z9ZdrxU_XVw@mail.g
mail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
At 15:27 24/02/2012, you wrote:
>De'vID:
> >> loQ *Emily Post* wIDabe'. vutpa'vaD: pIq poH
>
>Qov:
> > piq gets abused here. I saw it used instead of tugh earlier and
> here it should be qep vebvaD or something. pIq means [specified
> time period] from now, not "fututure".
>
>jatlhpu' ghorqon, {qo''e' tu'bogh pagh}. Delchu'meH chel, "the
>future". chay' qechvam vImughlaH?
jIbepDI' mu' qar vIchupniS'a'? :-) "future" mughmeH pIq lo'lu'DI'
vIqeH neH. {bov pIq} {bov veb} {nem} joq vImaS.
>De'vID:
> >> KIRK: nuqneH?
> >> SPOCK: pIH 'e' vItu'.
>
>Qov:
> > I find it expects it? Can't scroll well on this but tjis is too
> literal for "i find it suspicious". vay' pIH vItu'pu'
>
>chaq {mupIHmoH} vIlo'.
qaq. vIparHa'.
>De'vID:
> >> [1] - Alas, no word for "neutron"; it's technobabble, but a
> vital clue as any Trekkie knows that it signifies a cloaked ship.
>
>Qov:
> > Apparently I'm not trekkie enough. Is it too blatant to say
> So'wI' rurbogh woj?
>
>HIja'. woghlaw'. So'pu'bogh Duj tu', wej 'e' pIH *Spock*.
Sov Hoch Hov leng ngotlhwI', 'ach Sovbe''a' Spock'e'? Hujbej.
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
