[91935] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qIHpu'ghach wa'DIch: 'ay' cha'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Sun Jan 29 04:38:25 2012
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:38:06 +1000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmN3u0AR_ZOpTEE1=4_Z4k8rqKS9rtuZji-4ZLkWGs2LHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
--===============5513750120490574480==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_34642702-df03-475e-a92d-9b1a87b5cbd7_"
--_34642702-df03-475e-a92d-9b1a87b5cbd7_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
jIjatlhpu':
> PICARD: 'aqroS pIvlob. chIch ra'wI'ma' vIpabHa' [3] 'e' vIHech. Subepchug=
h=2C DaH pebep. QonoSwIjDaq Hoch beppu'ghach [4] vIqon.
mujang De'vID=2C jatlh:
> Why not just {ghu'} or {wanI'} for {beppu'ghach}? Or even {bep vay' 'e' v=
Iqon}.
{bep vay' 'e' vIqon} vIlaj.
I've noticed there were a few {-ghach}es in here that in retrospect I reall=
y didn't need. I'm trying to revise them as I post them but do keep pointin=
g them out when you come across them.
jIH:
> DATA: HoD=2C naDev Hoch nuvpu'vaD jIjatlh 'e' vIHar=2C jIjatlhDI': ghe''o=
rDaq luSpet 'oH ra'pu'ghachmaj Daq'e'.
De'vID:
> We have {ghu' Dachupbogh} for "your proposal" (paq'batlh p.144)=2C so why=
not {ghu' poQlu'bogh} for "orders"=2C or {ghu''e' poQbogh ra'wI'ma'} for "=
our orders"?
I changed {ra'pu'ghachmaj} to {ra'wI'ma'} earlier on=2C so I might do the s=
ame here: {ghe''orDaq luSpet 'oH ra'wI'ma' Daq'e'}.
jIH:
> PICARD: ghuH'a'. may' yaHmey jaH. chu'.
De'vID:
> There's {may' yIghuH} from Star Trek III=2C which I think is the native K=
lingon way of saying "all hands to battle stations".
tlho'. vIlaj. I'll use the clipped form {may' ghuH} just for consistency=2C=
though.
QeS 'utlh
=
--_34642702-df03-475e-a92d-9b1a87b5cbd7_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>
jIjatlhpu':<br>>=3B PICARD: 'aqroS pIvlob. chIch ra'wI'ma' vIpabHa' [3] '=
e' vIHech. Subepchugh=2C DaH pebep. QonoSwIjDaq Hoch beppu'ghach [4] vIqon.=
<div>
<br><BR>mujang De'vID=2C jatlh:<br><BR>>=3B Why not just {ghu'} or {wanI'=
} for {beppu'ghach}? Or even {bep vay' 'e' vIqon}.<BR><br><BR>{bep vay' 'e'=
vIqon} vIlaj.<br><BR><br><BR>I've noticed there were a few {-ghach}es in h=
ere that in retrospect I really didn't need. I'm trying to revise them as I=
post them but do keep pointing them out when you come across them.<br><BR>=
<br><BR>
jIH:<br>>=3B DATA: HoD=2C naDev Hoch nuvpu'vaD jIjatlh 'e' vIHar=2C jIjat=
lhDI': ghe''orDaq luSpet 'oH ra'pu'ghachmaj Daq'e'.<BR><br><BR>De'vID:<br><=
BR>>=3B We have {ghu' Dachupbogh} for "your proposal" (paq'batlh p.144)=
=2C so why not {ghu' poQlu'bogh} for "orders"=2C or {ghu''e' poQbogh ra'wI'=
ma'} for "our orders"?<BR><br><BR>I changed {ra'pu'ghachmaj} to {ra'wI'ma'}=
earlier on=2C so I might do the same here: {ghe''orDaq luSpet 'oH ra'wI'ma=
' Daq'e'}.<br><BR><br><BR>jIH:<br>
>=3B PICARD: ghuH'a'. may' yaHmey jaH. chu'.<BR><br><BR>De'vID:<br><BR>
>=3B There's {may' yIghuH} from Star Trek III=2C which I think is the nat=
ive Klingon way of saying "all hands to battle stations".<BR><br><BR>tlho'.=
vIlaj. I'll use the clipped form {may' ghuH} just for consistency=2C thoug=
h.<BR><br><BR>QeS 'utlh<br><BR></div> </div></body>
</html>=
--_34642702-df03-475e-a92d-9b1a87b5cbd7_--
--===============5513750120490574480==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============5513750120490574480==--
