[91837] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Opposite of 'o'megh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robyn Stewart)
Wed Jan 25 09:28:03 2012
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:24:55 -0800
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
From: Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W121F46D82051FA0B7A3FD6AA880@phx.gbl>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
You're right. I need to index my canon so I can not ask stupid
questions. I used to be able to hold it all in my head, but there's
too much now.
At 02:12 25/01/2012, you wrote:
>ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> > Would you consider bI'reS to be the opposite of 'o'megh or does
> > 'o'megh pertain only to narrative works?
>
>I'm confused. From the HolQeD article about endings (12:2), I
>thought that the opposite of {'o'megh} was {namtun}, not {bI'reS},
>and that both referred more specifically to parts of musical works.
>For narrative works, is it not {bertlham} versus {bI'reS}?
>
>taH:
> > A battle has an 'o'megh.
>
>Does it? Not meaning to doubt you here, but I don't remember ever
>seeing that used; can you give a canon example? (Perhaps it's in
>paq'batlh and I just don't remember it.) I'd've used {bertlham} instead.
>
>QeS 'utlh
>_______________________________________________
>Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
>http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
