[91762] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH vagh:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Thu Jan 19 11:21:58 2012
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120111173526.04710158@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:21:13 -0500
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> =93De'wI' pa' wIghoS. ra'wI'wI' ghaH vajar HoD'e'. ghutar 'oH pongwIj'e'.
> SarghwIj yI'uch 'etlhwIj vIjejmoHtaHvIS.=94 jatlh ghutar.
This sounds like a ritual greeting...and I see later that it basically
is. majQa'.
> =93rughtay[90] Degh DatuQbe'taH."
tuq pong 'oH rughtay'e', QIt 'e' vIyaj. DeghvaD <rughtay tuq Degh>
Daperchugh, SIbI' vIyaj.
> qaDbogh loD nayDI' lengbogh SuvwI' tuq <rughtay> lucher.
I'd have put it in the other order: <rughtay> tuq
We have examples that way: {molor tuq} "House of Molor" (my notes say
it was a MSN post in September 1997).
> jatlh vajar, =93lutvetlh Sovbe'pu'chugh, bImaw' 'e' Har.=94
Here, the {-be'pu'} order seems correct. "If he 'not knew' the story..."
> jatlh ghutar, =93rInDI' yaH poHraj peSam. tachDaq ghoDor.=94
{peSam}? Not {ghoSam} or {HISam}?
> jatlh vajar =93wa'Hu' Sojpa'Daq qechmey Daj boqeltaH SoH, ghutar je.
> Daqaw'a'?=94
wa'Hu' qaS'a'? QIt tlhetlh'a' lut poH? ghaytan moDHa'qu' laDtaHghachwIj neH.
> yev Hota'ro'. rav'eq bej.
yaj. ghaytan 'Ijlu'law'.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
