[91735] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH loS:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Tue Jan 17 16:05:53 2012
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120110210855.0470e528@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:05:15 -0500
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> QuSwI' ghaHchugh tojwI''a' ghaH je. chaq tarmo' lIjchu'pu' lagh.
chaq QuSbe' lagh, quv bopmo' ghaH.
> jatlh ghutar, =93Qo'! HISlaH 'e' vIHech. vIta'Qo'. vImunbej. jIQuSQo'!"
jumbej <HISlaH 'e' vIHech>. I understand the "No! I mean yes!" idea,
but I think the different types of yes/no answers make it at least as
understandable if it were just {Qo'! HISlaH!} followed by {vIta'Qo'.
HISlaH, jImunbej.}
Regardless of the words, I really enjoy the image of ghutar stumbling
over his answer.
> "Hota'ro'vaD jIghel, 'ach muyajHa'. reH Duj Hub neH. DuHubchoH.=94
Do'Ha' Hota'ro' mu'mey Qoyta'be' HoD.
> jatlh ghutar, =93cha'logh Daghor 'e' vIja'be'."
nuqjatlh? ghutar qech vIyajbe'.
> "rInDI' may' Homvetlh Daghorpu' 'e' wISov Hoch."
<wISov Hoch> vIyaj 'ach <Sov Hoch> vImaSlaw'.
> jatlh ghutar, =93wej pup 'ach DaHjaj betleH vIlo'laHchu'mo' jIbepbe'. nuH=
wIj
> vI'uchqa'laHmo' jIbelqu'.=94
betleH lo'laHbe'chugh bepbe'bej.
> qaStaHvIS cha' DIS *Dugh* ra' HoDvetlh, ghIq HoH jagh beH tIH.
"Dururbogh HoD jIHtaH. ghIq qIvwIj qIp beH tIH."
jItlhIj. Daghovbe'chugh qachuH.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
