[91722] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH wa':
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Mon Jan 16 22:20:35 2012
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120108044917.0469fad8@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:19:27 -0500
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> qaD 'oHbe'pu' 'e' Sovchu' ghutar.
> batlh vangmeH HoD tojta' ghutar.[85]
jaS ghu' vIyajnISchoH.
> *Dugh* muvDI'
> ghutar, QIpmo' ghu'mey yajbe' 'e' Har vajar. 'ach 'ong DaH 'e' tlhoj.
jaS ghaH vIchovpu'. QIpbe'. Qup 'ej jIv neH 'e' vIQub.
> jatlh =93jonwI' choQ Danaw'ta''a', HoD? Hung yaHDaq jeylIj vIleghpu' 'ej =
not
> 'el SuchwI' chaw'lIj. pa' DapawDI' Da'el net tuch.=94
chaw' Hevpa' HoD qaS qar'a'?
> jatlh ghutar, =93*Dugh* HungpIn jIHmo' Hung pat chu' vIleghDI' vInuD vIne=
H.
> patrajmo' Hem 'avwI'pu' tlhIbHa'."
patchajmo' Hem, qar'a'?
> "muQIj. HoDwI' vIQannISmo' ghochmeylIj vIlegh net tuchbe'.=94
>
> jatlh Hota'ro', =93pa' bISaH 'e' yIpegh. pa' ghoS SuchwI' net tuch.=94 to=
H,
> vIt'a'? toj'a'? ghuHmoHpu'mo' qImyal yep vajar.
tachDaq qaH'eng ghomchugh, ghaytan 'ollaH.
> =93qatlh maQaynIS?=94 jatlh ghutar.
tum'a' chut 'oH. Similar to the one forbidding an aspect suffix on a
verb with {'e'} as its object, perhaps.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
