[91689] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Fri Jan 13 14:23:04 2012
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120106144753.0ca57b00@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:22:25 -0500
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> ghutar has arrived at the computer room, and was seen chatting with a wom=
an.
The previous installment just said {vay'} and {ghaH}.
> pa' mach 'el ghutar. jatlh vajar, =93'Iv ghaH be'vetlh'e'?=94
toH, ghochuHta'.
> jatlh vajar, =93qatlh DuqaD loD DaHoHpu'bogh?=94
>
> jatlh ghutar, =93ghIntal vIpIHbe'pu'."
ghIntal vIpIHbe' je jIH. *ghIqtal* vIpIH.
> "qoghwIj chevpu'DI' vIHoy'rup.=94
(rIQmo' nach Dop, yopwaH vIbuSHa'.)
> "...Hoch 'Ighpu'wI' tlhabmoH batlh."
batlhHa' vangta''a' vavDaj vavnI'Daj ghap? vangmoH quvnISqa'ghach? ram
meqmey 'e' vISov, vISov...
> jatlh vajar, =93DunISchugh vay' <batlh yIvang> bIjatlh'a'?=94
ghutar qogh rur vajar wot wa'DIch. I think the {-chugh} clause has
been severed from its main verb by the quoted command.
> jatlh Hota'ro', =93Qagh 'oH neH patlhvam'e' qaja'pu'. bong munumpu'mo' Ho=
Dma',
> tawIjDaq muj DaH 'e' vISov.
Dach <"> Qav.
> jatlh ghutar, =93qaja'pu', Qagh yIleghQo'. quv neH yIlegh."
ghobvam pabchugh Hoch, wovchoH qo'.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
