[91665] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Is {chach} also a verb?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix Malmenbeck)
Thu Jan 12 07:09:04 2012

From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: De'vID jonpIn <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>, "tlhIngan-Hol@KLI.org"
 <tlhIngan-Hol@KLI.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:07:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNEYTpVuRposxZTsa-DMrvJcMC+-DQDjUfhupkPrzck3g@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

For the record, here's what it says in the notes:

---------
chach! ["Emergency!"] (untranslated) [ST6]; tlham chach chu'qa' "Restoring auxiliary gravity." (clipped?) [ST6]; "If I heard this correctly, chach appears to be acting as a quality here: 'backup/auxiliary gravity'. If it's a noun, I would expect the noun+noun phrase ?chach tlham 'emergency gravity'." /Steven Boozer [2006-10-04]; Article in HQ is called "Additional Vocabulary" and contains the veS QonoS list of words.
---------

That's the only reason I know of to suspect it's a verb.

________________________________________
From: De'vID jonpIn [de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 11:57
To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
Subject: [Tlhingan-hol] Is {chach} also a verb?

I have it as a noun "emergency, auxiliary, backup".  But I saw it
defined as "n. backup", "v. be emergency, be auxiliary" on
Klingonska.org.

Anyone know what's correct?

--
De'vID

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post