[90928] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Loose Klingon
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gaerfindel)
Sun Nov 27 00:15:01 2011
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 00:14:39 -0500
From: Gaerfindel <gaerfindel@hotmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
In-Reply-To: <4ED1B867.2050006@trimboli.name>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
--===============8199639125940745133==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------070708000208050001070506"
--------------070708000208050001070506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
nulI':
And here's where the difference between {chab chu} and {no' Hol} comes
into play.
~quljIb
On 11/26/2011 11:11 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
> More and more, the new canon we see appears to break rules. I believe
> that some of it is purely error, mostly the forgotten rules of no Type
> 5s on the first noun of a noun-noun, net instead of 'e', and Type 7 on
> the second verb of a sentence-as-object. However, there are some
> "rules" that I am beginning to question...
>
> ..I'm not sure whether to take these as signs that Okrand can't keep
> the whole thing in his head and makes LOTS of mistakes, or whether
> Klingon is supposed to be more "yeah, whatever" than we give it credit
> for. Remember the rigor their grammarians give to parts of speech...
>
--------------070708000208050001070506
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">nulI':<br>
And here's where the difference between {chab chu} and {no' Hol}
comes into play.</font><br>
<br>
~quljIb<br>
On 11/26/2011 11:11 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4ED1B867.2050006@trimboli.name" type="cite">More
and more, the new canon we see appears to break rules. I believe
that some of it is purely error, mostly the forgotten rules of no
Type 5s on the first noun of a noun-noun, net instead of 'e', and
Type 7 on the second verb of a sentence-as-object. However, there
are some "rules" that I am beginning to question...<br>
<br>
..I'm not sure whether to take these as signs that Okrand can't
keep the whole thing in his head and makes LOTS of mistakes, or
whether Klingon is supposed to be more "yeah, whatever" than we
give it credit for. Remember the rigor their grammarians give to
parts of speech...
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------070708000208050001070506--
--===============8199639125940745133==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============8199639125940745133==--
