daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Tue Nov 1 12:01:56 2011
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111030073704.056101e0@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 12:01:20 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
'ay'vam perDaq qar'a' <tup>? cha' weHwI' Hugh pe'taHvIS HoD, qaS
lup'e' 'e' Dellaw' lut.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Qov <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> cha' HughDu'vo' ghayqu'[35] 'Iw SuD, DejtaHvIS ghajwI'pu'chaj.
From the example of {bIQ ghaywI'}, I'd expect the substance being
emitted to be the object of the verb, not the subject. I tend to want
to interpret {-wI'} as a typical Type 9 verb suffix that can mark
entire clauses, though.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
