[89859] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] chIjwI' tIQ bom: 'ay' Qav
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Thu Sep 29 17:26:15 2011
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W57FC56E4ACFAF5041E92A0AAF60@phx.gbl>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:25:33 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh
<qeslagh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Doqqu'choHpu'bogh pormey rur;
> ngem bIQtIq retlhDaq pum
> yav So'lu'pu'DI' peDqu'mo',
> be'Daj ghu SopDI' mughato',
> wuptaHvIS cha'par ghum. >
nuq tlhutlhtaH Coleridge jay'?
> [1] A lazy, lazy way of reaching for a rhyme here. I have my doubts as
> to if the Quch - QeH pair would be accepted in a law'/puS construction
> and I'm working on a decent recast.
For what it's worth, I recognized it as a law'/puS immediately, though
the word pair is definitely unusual. If you don't like it, and if you
need the {-meH} rhyme, perhaps {ghoQ/DeH} would work.
> [3] I promise I never meant to slip so much religion under your noses.
> I've flipped back and forth between Kahless and god/God/gods/Gods, and
> I'm checking now to see if it all makes more or less sense.
Consistency is a fine goal. However, I wouldn't be too worried about
how much sense it makes. :-P
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
