[89843] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wejmaH Soch
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Wed Sep 28 15:33:09 2011
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110927154419.05299170@flyingstart.ca>
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:32:20 -0400
To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Mostly grammar nitpicks...
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> ngugh yaS wa'DIch je qIp neH vajar.
Unless you meant "the officer and the first", {je} here should go
after the verb.
> ...'ej mIch loS vagh je naw'laHbe' vay'.
I think you need to say {mIch loS mIch vagh je}. Numbers used as
labels like this don't act like nouns the way ordinal numbers can.
> jatlh DeghwI' "HoD, chay' chora'? ghochmajDaq machungqa' DaneH'a'?"
>
> jangmeH HoD jatlh "He wIghochchu'meH chuyDaH yIlo', 'ach lughchoHpu'DI' He
I don't see how {-choHpu'-} adds anything useful to {lughDI'} in this sentence.
> chung 'e' yImev. Duj Dotlh yIjIH."
{chung} is missing a prefix, no?
> tagha' jatlh HoD "'ungya, pa'wIjDaq."
I do hope 'ungya spent time as a tactical officer before being promoted.
> mIch vaghDaq pIvghor Hongghor HIchDal je
> lutu'lu' ghaytan QIHmo' poSchoHpu' lo' law' lojmItHom, vaj ghaytan Dechbogh
> Som QIHlu' je 'ach meHvo' Som QIH lupojlaHbe'.
I get lost somewhere in the middle of this overlong sentence. There's
missing punctuation, or a problem with Type 9 verb suffixes, or both.
DaH pab vIbuSbe' 'ej lut vIbuSqa'.
> mIch loS Qugh lupojlaHbe' 'ej lutI'laHbe' 'ej
> luyajlaHbe'.
'ej puch lulo'laHbe', 'e' yIlIjQo'.
> "vItlhe'qu' DaneH'a'."
chaq jatlh tlhIngan <qaluH DaneH'a'>.
> rav bejchoH HoD. "bIlugh 'ungya. pe'vIl mu'qaDmey tIbach."
nuqjatlh? DeghwI' Qob qaD net Hech'a'?
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
