[89800] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Google Search in Klingon
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven Litaer)
Fri Sep 23 10:08:42 2011
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:05:51 +0200
From: "Lieven Litaer" <levinius@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <2CCD1E55-ECF6-4507-8041-BF5002EEAAED@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
I think lojmIt intended to send this to the list. I will answer below.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:18:28 -0400
> Von: lojmIt tI\'wI\'nuv <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com>
> An: Lieven Litaer <levinius@gmx.de>
> I've heard Okrand repeatedly insist that Klingon has no infinitive.
> Perhaps you can consider it "clipped", though I'm not sure that's appropriate,
> since this is not a battle situation. It belittles the purpose of clipped
> Klingon to clip something that has no actual urgency.
>
> Since most computers in the Star Trek world have verbal interfaces, I'd
> expect menus in software like this to reflect what a person were to say if
> they were speaking to the computer, issuing commands. yIpoS'eghmoH! yImev!
> chu'wI' yIcha'!
>
> pItlh
> lojmIt tI'wI'nuv
Okay, I did not know that. So I will call it "clipped". (btw arabic has no infinitive either, every dictionary contains the third person form, just like in Klingon :-)
But, back to topic:
Wouldn't these commands be like those told to an animal? You say {ba'}, and not {yIba'}. If Klingons regard animals not like real people, I doubt they might be polite to a computer. Is that an argument to use clipped klingon?
Quvar.
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
