[89703] in tlhIngan-Hol
Redundancy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (lojmIt tI'wI'nuv)
Thu Sep 15 13:10:57 2011
From: lojmIt tI'wI'nuv <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:00:25 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
We know that Klingons care little for grammatical redundancy, dropping plural suffixes where the prefix makes it clear that something is plural, etc. So, I was wondering…
DaHjaj megh wISop be'nalwI'.
Does that make sense to people? I could say, {DaHjaj megh wISop be'nalwI' jIH je}, but the {jIH je} really is grammatically redundant, isn't it? I mean, you know the speaker had to be part of it, being first person plural and all. Right?
pItlh
lojmIt tI'wI'nuv
