[89658] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'maH wa' "B"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Tue Sep 13 11:59:46 2011
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:51:00 +1000
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110911170727.046c8b90@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> ngechDajDaj leStaH nachDaj.
That's the second time I've seen the sequence -DajDaj in your writing...
Odd how certain typos just seem to come naturally to the fingers. (I do
the same thing in English all the time.)
> yotlh SumDaq vum Sungpu' puS.
'ej qaSpu'DI' nungbogh wanI', *DaH* Satlh vIbuSlaH 'e' DaQubqu''a'?? :P
> tIr yoblaw.
Dach qaghwI'.
> loD wa'DIch volchaHvo' HuS wa' 'e'rIn
{'er'In} 'oH.
> 'ej cha'DIch volchaHDu'vo' HuS megh'an. yIttaHvIS cha' loDpu' tIr
> pe'taH. pumpu'DI' tI boS puqpu' 'ej rutlh ghajbogh HIjwI' machDaq
> lan. lutlh.
'ach Dajqu'! Qapbej. pIm yobmeH mIwvam tera' yobmeH mIwmey je vISovbogh.
pup 'ay'vam HochHom. QaghHommey neH lutu'lu'. vItIv. Bit of an anticlimax
(...if ya know what I mean) after the last section, but that's only to be
expected. The conflict and rationalisation that Mahoun's putting himself
through come across well again: still jarring, but now I know that's what
you were shooting for, and you're nailing it.
QeS 'utlh
