[89578] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: chIjwI' tIQ bom: 'ay' loS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Sun Sep 11 09:17:31 2011
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
In-Reply-To: <BAY166-W30F0676A134E2BD17FA4ABAA030@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:11:35 -0400
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Sep 11, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com
> wrote:
> 'o [2] Quchbogh Dep! 'IHchu'ghachchaj
> lumaqlaHbe' nuvpu':
> bIHvaD muSHa'ghach tlhuD tIqwIj
> 'ej bIH vIquvmoHchu'.
> muvupchoHbej mu'avbogh qa',
> 'ej bIH vIquvmoHchu'.
>
> ngugh QunwI'vaD jIjatlhchoHlaH,
> 'ej tagha' mongwIjvo'
> ngaQHa'choH yatqap, bIQDaq pum;
> baS ngogh rur, vaj tlhotQo'.
>
> --------
> [1] In the absence of a word for "be wide", I've recast here. Klingon
> has a lot of vertical verbs - jen, 'eS, woch, run, 'ab, Saw' - but
> almost nothing for the horizontal.
>
> [2] Very glad to have this word!
>
>
>
