[89534] in tlhIngan-Hol
RE: mu'mey chu': jul
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix Malmenbeck)
Fri Sep 9 12:21:36 2011
From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:13:18 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNk+WoAbfA2Rcp2pcug8R4SbNAAD=FN+F4N7vMURdrHRw@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
> qIDvam yajlaHchugh ghaH neH, chay' qIDna' 'oH 'e' DaSovlaw'?
>
> (A bit rusty… someone remind me if the <chay'> should go between the <'oH>
and the <'e'>.)
The only canonical example I can find of adverby chuvmey being used to modify the second sentence in an 'e' construction is S26: http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file=1996-sbx-s26.txt&query=DuraS
{DuraS tuq tlhIngan yejquv patlh luDub 'e' reH lunIDtaH DuraS be'nI'pu' lurSa' be'etor je.}
The sisters of the House of Duras, Lursa™ and B'Etor™ are constantly seeking a higher standing for the House of Duras within the Klingon™ High Council.
Judging by this example, the chay' should in fact be placed between 'e' and DaSovlaw'. I personally think this looks like a mistake, but it could simply be an deviation from the expected rules.
________________________________________
From: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org [tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org] on behalf of De'vID ( ) [de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 17:39
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Subject: Re: mu'mey chu': jul
On Sep 6, 2011 2:42 PM, "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:
> chaq qIDHey yajlaH ghaH neH. <pe'vIl> rurlaH.
qID 'oH'a' <pe'vIl>?
qIDvam yajlaHchugh ghaH neH, chay' qIDna' 'oH 'e' DaSovlaw'?
(A bit rusty… someone remind me if the <chay'> should go between the <'oH>
and the <'e'>.)
-- De'vID
