[89527] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'maH chorgh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Fri Sep 9 03:05:22 2011
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:59:03 +1000
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110906175233.04c5dfd8@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
vItIvtaHqu'. 'ach bIpIvtaH'a'? DeS Da'oy'be'choHmoHlaw'mo' qaghel neH!
ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
> mu'mey Sovbogh QIt lo' Mahoun.
Hmm. This is one problem about adverb placement. You remember when I
mentioned it last time? Not so sure this time. Because -bogh clauses
are basically stand-alone noun phrases, I don't know if QIt should
go before mu'mey (and so before the object), or where you've put it
in order to resolve the ambiguity. chuvmey jay'.
> "poH nI' tlhIngan bIghHa' jIHtaHmo' loQ vIghojpu'.
I'm assuming the missing -Daq here is deliberate.
> "vIcherghlaH. muHoHbe' be'vam 'e' vIHar. tej ghaH. "
chaq joy' HaD ghaH! rut 'e' ghovlaHbe' vay'.
*ahem*
> tlhuHqu'taHmo' Mahoun tlhuHHa' 'ej yapbe' yInSIp tlhuHpu'bogh.
> vulchoH 'ej yavDaq pum.
Klingons may not hyperventilate, but this is great descriptive prose.
I could imagine all this very vividly. majQa'.
> Hey, at least I didn't break his arm. I haven't broken anyone's arm
> this whole story. What a warm fuzzy story.
"Su'Ijrup'a', puqpu'? vaj matagh."
QeS 'utlh
