[894] in tlhIngan-Hol
Poem-- qabej
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Mon May 17 13:39:53 1993
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: (Mark E. Shoulson) <shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Mon, 17 May 93 09:10:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: Captain Krankor's message of Fri, 14 May 93 15:27:25 -0400 <930514
>From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
>Date: Fri, 14 May 93 15:27:25 -0400
>Content-Length: 628
>>>(Quch 'IHqu vIghajmo' {{;-)
>>Quch QuchmoH 'oH'a'? (just in case: "is it a happy-making/cheering
>>forehead?) {{{-)
>Oh my. Now we're *really* gonna have some controversy about 4.4
>{{:-) We already had the discussion about whether or not we could
>put -be' on an adjectival verb. What about -moH? Is Quch QuchmoH
>legal or does it have to be QuchmoHbogh Quch? At this point I'm not
>even sure I wanna venture an opinion. {{:-)
Not at this point you won't have such controversy, not from me. I realized
after I wrote it that there could be such a problem, and I'm not so
enamored of the sentence that I want to fight about it, so I'm willing to
see it as "QuchmoH'a' Quch?" or even "Quch Quch 'oH'a'?" (different
meaning).
'Course, it's probably worth arguing about anyway.
>'ach, HIja', QuchmoHbogh Quch 'oHbej. 'e' DaSovpu', mark. vItuQtaH
>'e' Dalegh 'ej jIH muQuchmoHba'! {{:-)
>naDev Quch ghaj 'Iv? ghaj DrujIv 'e' vISov... 'Iv latlh?
> --Qanqor
~mark
