[89350] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: wej no' lughmey tlhIngan wo' joqwI' je
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robyn Stewart)
Thu Sep 1 15:28:07 2011
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:19:16 -0700
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Robyn Stewart <robyn@flyingstart.ca>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP1760D2979318E09AC0A28E2D2190@phx.gbl>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
nger vI'oghlI':
chenmeH tlhIngan wo' wa'DIch, muvchuq wej wo'Hom. wo' chu' botlhDaq
Qamchugh vay' tIngDaq wa' tu'lu', 'evDaq latlh tu'lu' 'ej chanDaq
potlhwI' tu'lu'. vaj wo'meymo' lurghmey luponglu'.
At 11:55 01/09/2011, you wrote:
>On 9/1/2011 11:53 AM, Robyn Stewart wrote:
>
>loQ tlhe'lu'chugh Qap. Or maybe east is up for Klingons, so the Doq is
>east, the dark SuD is 'ev and the light SuD is tIng. My mnemonic is that
>USA qellu'DI', tIngseltown (LA) is in the southwest 'everett (Everett)
>is in the northwest and chana (China) is far off to the east. - Qov
>
>That's been my theory. Why east <<chan>> should be so important that
>it's (a) at the top, (b) longer than the others, and (c) <<Doq>> is
>known only to Maltz. This is assuming I'm correct, of course. ~quljIb
