[89247] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Questions on "expanded" noun-noun phrases
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Philip Newton)
Tue Aug 30 09:58:18 2011
In-Reply-To: <F52986192E9FE346B0B7EF3D6F98E87711BDB4C8@EXDB3.ug.kth.se>
From: Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:50:34 +0200
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 15:22, Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se> wrote:
> Then, of course, one can also interpret it as "Warrior #3's weapons", but if that were the correct interpretation, it'd probably be clear from context. Also, one can specify this by writing SuvwI' wejDIch nuHmey.
Hm, if you have five Klingons in a row and they all have personnel
numbers, then the third Klingon might not be Klingon #3....
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>
