[89079] in tlhIngan-Hol
RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Terrence Donnelly)
Fri Aug 19 12:44:39 2011
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A602D46C0BDBE4@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
I understood it as "sole, single, only"
-- ter'eS
--- On Fri, 8/19/11, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
> From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
> Subject: RE: mu'mey chu': ngIq
> To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
> Date: Friday, August 19, 2011, 11:18 AM
> jIyajbe' jIH je. <<
> majority?, nearly all?>> 'oS mu' 'e' vIQub.
> (Although how {ngIq} would differ from {HochHom} "most,
> greater part" isn't clear.)
>
> --
> Voragh
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SuStel
> >>
> >> 'eybe'bogh mu'tlheghmeylIj vIyajbe'. yIQIjchu'.
> "Current, not previous (n)"?
> >>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ghunchu'wI' 'utlh
> >
> > ghe'naQ <'u'> bom mu'mey DIlaD 'ej DIchov.
> > ghItlhDaq 'op mu'mey DISovpu'be'bogh DItu'.
> > Soch mu' ghaj tetlh vIgherbogh.
> > naDev wa' DIp vImuch: <ngIq>
> >
> > Qatlh mu'vam. loQ <Hoch> rur.
> > cha' lo' chovnatlh DIlegh.
> >
> > wa' Doch nungchugh, le'chu' Dochvetlh. rurbogh latlh
> tu'lu'be'.
> > <nqIq voDleH wItoy'.>
> > wa' voDleH neH tu'lu'. ghaH wItoy'.
> >
> > Doch law' nungchugh, ghu' rap SIQ Hoch Doch, pagh ta'
> rap ta' Hoch Doch,
> > 'ach quqbe'.
> > le' Hoch Doch. SIQ/vang wa' ghIq SIQ/vang latlh ghIq
> SIQ/vang latlh...
> > <ngIq paqmey vIlaD.>
> > paq wa'DIch vIlaD. vIlaDta'DI', paq veb vIlaD. tagha'
> paq Qav vIlaD. reH wa'
> > paq neH vIlaDlI'.
> > <lomDaq tuy' ngIq
> SuvwI'pu'.>
> > tlheghDaq Qam SuvwI'pu'. Duv SuvwI' wa'DIch 'ej tuy'.
> mej. Duv SuvwI' veD
> > 'ej tuy'. mej. not tuy' cha' SuvwI'pu' quq.
> >
> > mobchugh <ngIq>, wa' le'chu'wI' 'oS 'e' vIloy,
> 'ach DIch vIghajlaHbe'.
> >
> > -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>
>
>
