[89061] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: mu'mey chu': matlh vItlho'qu'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (lojmIt tI'wI' nuv)
Thu Aug 18 21:56:25 2011
From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <000301cc5dd6$fc8d6090$f5a821b0$@trimboli.name>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:53:21 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
I'm with David on this one. Obviously some prefer the dribs and drabs. I don't. Since several have spoken up in support of the piecemeal approach, David should know that he does not stand alone.
lojmIt tI'wI'nuv
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:45 PM, "David Trimboli" <david@trimboli.name> wrote:
> One day someone will finally see fit to simply list the new words that come
> out of a qep'a' or product and their definitions in a single message, rather
> than playing the I-know-something-that-you-don't game. Getting them in dribs
> and drabs is not only irritating, it makes it hard to look up the original
> message later.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org [mailto:tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org] On
> Behalf Of ghunchu'wI' 'utlh
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:33 PM
> To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
> Subject: Re: mu'mey chu': matlh vItlho'qu'
>
> 2011/8/18 Lucifuge Rofocale <fiat_knox@yahoo.co.uk>
>> DIS poHvam mu' chu' 'ar nob matlh? cha' mu'meyvam neH?
>>
> ghe'naQ bom mu'mey DInuDtaHvIS, chorgh mu'mey DItu'.
> qep'a' jaj Qav mu' HutDIch wIHev je.
>
> qaStaHvIS Hogh ngIq mu'meyvam vI'anglI'.
> (HIja', chu' <ngIq>. QIj wa'leS QInwIj.)
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
