[88872] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Hegh'a' Holmaj?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (lojmIt tI'wI' nuv)
Fri May 13 13:11:53 2011
From: "lojmIt tI'wI' nuv" <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <877535.82866.qm@web82606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:05:36 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
<<wej 'e' tlhojbe' neH>>?
nuqjatlh?
Is this the cue to rehash the double-negative discussion?
pItlh.
lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
On May 13, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> Heghpu' Holmaj; Hegh wej 'e' tlhojbe' neH.
>
> -- ter'eS
>
> --- On Fri, 5/13/11, lojmIt tI'wI' nuv <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: lojmIt tI'wI' nuv <lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Hegh'a' Holmaj?
>> To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
>> Date: Friday, May 13, 2011, 9:21 AM
>> DaHjaj po jIvemmeH mughuHmoH
>> tlhaqwIj. jIHu'. jItuQ'eghmoH. nIQ vISop. yaHwIj vIghoSmeH
>> jIyIt. chal vIqel. tugh SISchugh vISIv. (I know. Some will
>> object to that construction and doubtless tell me how I
>> should have said it. Consider it a favor I'm doing you to
>> give you something to respond to and jar you out of an
>> otherwise boring day.)
>>
>> yaHDaq jIvum. jIyev. Hegh'a' Holmaj?
>>
>> pItlh.
>> lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
