[88685] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: monastery: more
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doq)
Sun Jan 16 20:54:03 2011
In-Reply-To: <4D335D60.9020508@web.de>
From: Doq <doq@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:46:47 -0500
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
majqa'. So, perhaps the final definition should be something like "monastery, religious community building(s)"?
Doq
On Jan 16, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Lieven Litaer wrote:
> Hi Klingons,
> after the confusion about {ghIn}, I got a chance to talk with Maltz:
>
> -----
> He said that perhaps "religious community" was not the best choice of
> words for what he intended to say. What he meant was that while a
> {ghIn} could be a single building if that's all the monastery was, it
> could also refer to a group of buildings and accompanying grounds
> (gardens or whatever) -- the whole defined area where the members of the
> religious community live or work or do whatever they do there. It
> doesn't mean the group of people. Maltz hopes that helps and doesn't
> make things more confusing.
> -----
>
> for your notes:
> Email from Marc Okrand of 7th jan. 2011.
>
> Quvar,
> aka
> Lieven L. Litaer
>
>
>
