[88634] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: mu'tlheghvam yIlughmoH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ruben Molina)
Fri Jan 7 18:17:01 2011
In-Reply-To: <F52986192E9FE346B0B7EF3D6F98E87710A6E1AF@EXDB3.ug.kth.se>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:09:54 -0500
From: Ruben Molina <rmolina@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:09 PM, lojmIt tI'wI' nuv
<lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could just drop the {'e'} in all of these and you'd be fine.
>
> chay' yInlIj van? Wej jISov.
> batlh Hegh'a'? wej maSov.
DuHvam vISovbe'.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se> wrote:
> Personally, I think that nuq {'oH bomvam 'o'megh'e'. wej vISovbe'.} works.
jIQochbe'. DaH mu'tlhegh Hujbe' rur. Qoch'a' vay'
{nuqDaq 'oH puchpa''e'} 'e' vIQubtaH.
'ach vISIv, {wej vISovbe'} ghap {wej vISov}, 'ej qatlh
Satlho'
ruben
