[88621] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: mu'tlheghvam yIlughmoH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ruben Molina)
Fri Jan 7 15:48:53 2011
In-Reply-To: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A60218B08F9432@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:37:11 -0500
From: Ruben Molina <rmolina@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
> Voragh:
>>> chay' van bomvam? wej 'e' vISov.
>>> How does this song end? I don't know [that] yet.
> Actually, this wasn't the dreaded question-as-object (QAO). That would be (correcting my earlier mis-use of {van}):
>
> * wej chay' bomvam luvan 'e' vISov.
> I don't know how they end this song yet.
>
> It's actually two separate sentences.
>
> chay' bomvam luvan? wej 'e' vISov.
> How do they end this song? I don't know that yet.
>
bIlugh.
'ach, bomvamvaD bertlham ghItlh jIH'e', vaj: «chay' bomvam vIvan? wej
'e' vISov.» vIjatlh. qar'a.
DaH, 'Iv wanI' van? 'e' wISovbe'chugh, vaj nuq wIjatlh?
"chay' yIn qun van? wej 'e' wISov.", qar'a'
"chay' yInlIj van? wej 'e' wISov."
(van'a' pagh Dor'a')
wej qaS wanI'. yIn ghaH. Hegh
