[88239] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: gha'tlhIq
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Fri Sep 3 16:48:13 2010
In-Reply-To: <DFD5C087-E525-4868-8BA2-E3898E2B2CDD@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 16:36:05 -0400
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:49 AM, lojmIt tI'wI' nuv <
lojmitti7wi7nuv@gmail.com> wrote:
> The time stamp doesn't work for me. {tujbogh pem nI' po} has the adjective
> {nI'} between two nouns that I would otherwise take to be a noun-noun
> construction. That doesn't work. There can be no words between words in a
> noun-noun construction.
>
It works fine for me. It apparently works for Okrand as well, since the
recent {'u' ghe'naQ jabbI'ID} includes the phrase {poH tuj bI'reS}.
-- ghunchu'wI'
