[88095] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: mu' chu'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix Malmenbeck)
Tue Jul 27 14:10:35 2010
From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:02:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <COL124-W151D1671EF31ED3C19D73AF2A70@phx.gbl>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Very interesting information, there, Agnieszka!
> Actually, the word which appeared in the English text of the opera was the word "signal,"
> and I believe it is appropriate to add this sense to the gloss for the word {maQ}.
If I may ask: What was the context of this word? That is to say: What sort of signal was it?
Was it an artificial signal, a message from some greater power...?
> If they'd been at the champagne a little too heavily, they could have interpreted your words as literal truth. ;)
True!
On a side-note: It seems my e-mail client maybe confusing the archiving system a bit by using "SV:" instead of "Re:" in the subject line. My apologies for this; I'll make sure to compensate manually for this in the future.
//Felix
