[87986] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: pIqaD handwriting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MorphemeAddict)
Tue May 4 18:20:50 2010
In-Reply-To: <530980FCBA3A4A04B1B6688830E5727E@no1>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 18:19:36 -0400
From: MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
IIRC, the style on *ghIlghameS* is a block style that was described and
illustrated in *HolQeD*.
That block style is what I based my cursive style on.
lay'tel SIvten
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Seruq <seruq@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > I recently received a postcard where the sender wrote their
> > message in pIqaD.
> >
> > My excitement soon faded when I realized that handwritten
> > pIqaD is remarkably different than when typed with a computer.
> >
> > It was also different than the way I write the characters myself.
> >
> > Eventually, I found out that they used
> > http://klingonska.org/pic/longhand.jpg
> >
> >
> > So, is there a style that's more (or less) preferred than others?
> >
> > Anyone else had problems reading pIqaD written by someone else?
> >
> > --
> > ~naHQun
>
>
> Years ago there were some of us for a little while exchanged letters that
> were handwritten in pIqaD
> so we could practice reading various styles of handwriting.
>
> I see that the site you listed has some examples of my handwriting.
> http://klingonska.org/piqadpic.html
>
>
> There is another style, not shown on that site, that is pictured on the
> cover of ghIlghameS. I'm
> sure someone has a pic of it somewhere.
>
>
> DloraH
>
>
>
>
>
>
