[87849] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Philosophical plurals...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven Litaer)
Wed Mar 3 14:39:54 2010

Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:27:00 +0100
From: Lieven Litaer <qepHom@gmx.de>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A601389278082A@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

ghItlh Steven Boozer:

> Thus if one still views corpses as individual "persons" you can use {lompu'} - Terran might well do this - otherwise Klingons use {lommey} to refer to them as empty shells.

I do not really wish to contradict my admired Master of Ca'non, but here 
I must. We have had this same question quite recently, and we came to 
the result that {-pu'} only works with body-PARTS, not the body itself.

So living or not, they are definitely {lommey}.

Quvar.






home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post