[87840] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Philosophical plurals...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Mon Mar 1 09:25:27 2010
In-Reply-To: <d77660401002281928k7adc8764jb944434fe49f7615@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:51:09 -0500
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:28 PM, qaS'ar lI' <kashar.li@gmail.com> wrote:
> Corpses are, in the context I'm curious about, objects that at one time
> possessed the capacity for speech.
jIQoch. jatlhlaH nuv. HeghDI' ghaH, nuv ghaHbe' porgh. lom moj.
jatlhlaHbe' lom. narghpu' qa'.
> ...what is a
> Klingon poet to do to differentiate "corpses" from "corpses scattered all
> about", which is necessary to make any battle aftermath scene complete?
tlhIngan bomwI' jIHbe', 'ach che'ron Doq vIqelnISDI', lommey neH
vIDelbe'. ghopmey, nachmey, luHmey je vIDel.
-- ghunchu'wI'
