[87785] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: KLBC: tlhIngan qeq
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (kff@sics.se)
Wed Feb 3 16:59:16 2010
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:56:26 +0100
From: kff@sics.se
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <848013.60308.qm@web82606.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Quoting Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>:
> (It's unclear to me if quvar was intending to suggest corrections or
> let these stand on their own. As the last BG, I'll take the liberty
> of responding. If I have overstepped my bounds, please excuse me and
> let me know.)
cholughmoHmo' jIquvbej!
>
> --- On Tue, 2/2/10, kff@sics.se <kff@sics.se> wrote:
>
>> QInlIj vIHev 'e' vIquv!
>> (I am honored to receive your message)
>>
>
> Since {quv} 'be honored' doesn't take objects, this should be
How do I know which Klingon verbs are (in)transitive? TKD does not say
(as far as I can see).
> QInlIj vIHevmo' jIquv
>
> (note the "no object" verb prefix on {quv})
>
> [pe'...] Mostly good, but watch the capitalization of 'I'
pIj jIghItlhHa'
...
> maj. batlh DaghItlh.
batlh jIHvaD tlhIngan Hol DaghojmoHbej. qatlho'.
/buSwI'
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
