[87638] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Hypothetical (reconstructed) vocabulary?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Lytle)
Sat Jan 9 09:32:46 2010
In-Reply-To: <81052C79-D7E9-4F4C-A29C-476E42FD3271@evertype.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:30:04 -0500
From: Steven Lytle <lytlesw@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Works for me.
lay'SIv
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>wrote:
> Not that I am in a position to propose anything, but I've always
> thought that "lIl" would be an excellent word for "difficult to
> discern; illegible".
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
>
>
>
>
