[87598] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: qoSwIj
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Tue Jan 5 08:20:54 2010
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:19:12 -0500
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
In-reply-to: <1cb7130b1001050512i35901a3ckdd01427cf9ced3ad@mail.gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On 1/5/2010 8:12 AM, Tracy Canfield wrote:
> It's not clear from me how you get from some words being marked as
> (adv) in the glossary to adverbial being defined as a specific list.
All right, chalk it up to a poor turn of phrase on my part.
>
> 2010/1/4 David Trimboli<david@trimboli.name>:
>> On 1/4/2010 10:50 PM, Tracy Canfield wrote:
>>> 2010/1/4 David Trimboli<david@trimboli.name>:
>>>> TKD defines "adverbial" to be a specific list of words
>>>
>>> Does it? The phrasing is
>>>
>>> 5.4 Adverbials
>>>
>>> These words usually come at the beginning of a sentence and describe
>>> the manner of the activity.
>>>
>>> It seems like you're interpreting "these words" to refer to the list,
>>> but to me the phrase seems to refer to "adverbials".
>>
>> Yes, if you look in the Addendum word list, you'll find {DaHjaj} is
>> translated "today (n)," but there are a bunch of words in the various
>> word lists that are translated with the note "(adv)," like {DaH} "now
>> (adv)."
>>
>> I was not interpreting the phrase "these words."
>>
>> Even if we consider that Klingon grammarians don't distinguish
>> "adverbials" as a part of speech, {DaHjaj} is a {DIp}, while all the
>> words in 5.4, and presumably all the words labeled "(adv)" or described
>> by Okrand as "adverbials," are {chuvmey}.
>>
>> --
>> SuStel
>> http://www.trimboli.name/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/
