[87446] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Numbers with pronouns
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Doty)
Wed Dec 2 18:35:35 2009
In-Reply-To: <DF2530ED7E6D46CCBFFECEA8CAD9D3E7@juH.Seruqtuq.net>
From: Christopher Doty <suomichris@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:27:17 -0800
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
I think the list might have hiccuped. This was about the point at
which I got an email response from Voragh to this, with his response
timestamped as EARLIER than your original message... Unless Voragh
can time travel. (And if you can, why are you holding out on us!
Let's go to the future!!!)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 15:23, Seruq <seruq@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Weird. When I sent that message, it included two quoted lines that I was replying to. When I
> received it back, the quoted lines were stripped off.
>
>
>>
>> jIQub vaj jIH.
>>
>> It's not canon. I suppose it could be labelled as poetic
>> license. But how would you do that sentence?
>>
>>
>> DloraH
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
