[87245] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: {-lu'} on intransitive verbs [WAS Re: The topic marker -'e']
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Doty)
Fri Nov 27 11:26:09 2009
In-Reply-To: <772B2F36-8E63-42FC-9B3C-BF8155F279ED@alcaco.net>
From: Christopher Doty <suomichris@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:24:32 -0800
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:17, ghunchu'wI' <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:
>
> There indeed is something like nominalization going on here, but it's
> the {'e'} that does it. It serves its normal purpose of standing in
> for the action of the first sentence, as the object of the second
> sentence.
No, it's not.
